• Basic knowledge of Arm Treasure Data.
• Basic knowledge of Presto query engine.

Only specifying the columns you need

Actual data in Treasure Data is stored as a columnar storage format, which is optimized for the query using only specific columns. Restricting accessed columns can improve your query performance significantly. Specify only needed columns instead of using a wildcard (*).

[GOOD]: SELECT time,user,host FROM tbl
[BAD]:  SELECT * FROM tbl

Leveraging Time-based partitioning

All imported data is automatically partitioned into hourly buckets, based on the ‘time’ field within each data record. By specifying the time range in your query, you can avoid reading unnecessary data and can thus speed up your query significantly.

1.) WHERE time <=> Integer

When the ‘time’ field within the WHERE clause is specified, the query parser automatically detects which partitions should be processed. This auto detection does not work if you specify the time with float instead of int.

[GOOD]: SELECT field1, field2, field3 FROM tbl WHERE time > 1349393020
[GOOD]: SELECT field1, field2, field3 FROM tbl WHERE time > 1349393020 + 3600
[GOOD]: SELECT field1, field2, field3 FROM tbl WHERE time > 1349393020 - 3600
[BAD]:  SELECT field1, field2, field3 FROM tbl WHERE time > 13493930200 / 10
[BAD]:  SELECT field1, field2, field3 FROM tbl WHERE time > 1349393020.00
[BAD]:  SELECT field1, field2, field3 FROM tbl WHERE time BETWEEN 1349392000 AND 1349394000

2.) TD_TIME_RANGE

An easier way to slice data is to use TD_TIME_RANGE UDF.

[GOOD]: SELECT ... WHERE TD_TIME_RANGE(time, '2013-01-01 PDT')
[GOOD]: SELECT ... WHERE TD_TIME_RANGE(time, '2013-01-01', NULL, 'PDT')
[GOOD]: SELECT ... WHERE TD_TIME_RANGE(time, '2013-01-01',
                                       TD_TIME_ADD('2013-01-01', '1day', 'PDT'))

However, if you use division in TD_TIME_RANGE, time partition opimization doesn’t work. For instance, the following conditions disable optimization.

[BAD]: SELECT ... WHERE TD_TIME_RANGE(time, TD_SCHEDULED_TIME() / 86400 * 86400))
[BAD]: SELECT ... WHERE TD_TIME_RANGE(time, 1356998401 / 86400 * 86400))

TD_INTERVAL UDF is also available to slice data. TD_INTERVAL provides an intuitive way to specify the time range. 

# The last 7 days
[GOOD]: SELECT ... WHERE TD_INTERVAL(time, '-7d')

Considering the cardinality within GROUP BY

It's possible to improve the performance of the GROUP BY function by carefully ordering a list of fields within GROUP BY in an order of high cardinality.

[GOOD]: SELECT GROUP BY uid, gender
[BAD]:  SELECT GROUP BY gender, uid

Another tip for using GROUP BY: use numbers instead of strings for the GROUP BY column because numbers require less memory are faster to compare than strings.

Use LIMIT with ORDER BY

ORDER BY requires that all rows be sent to a single worker which then sorts them. ORDER BY might often require a lot of memory on a Presto worker. When you want to look up the top or bottom N records, use LIMIT which can reduce the sort cost and memory pressure.

[GOOD]: SELECT * FROM tbl ORDER BY time LIMIT 100
[BAD]:  SELECT * FROM tbl ORDER BY time

Using approximate aggregate functions

Presto has a couple of approximate aggregation functions, that give you significant performance improvements, but with some errors. For example, by using approx_distinct() function, you can get an approximation of COUNT(DISTINCT x) with a standard error of 2.3%. The following example gives an approximate count of the previous day’s unique users.

SELECT
  approx_distinct(user_id)
FROM
  access
WHERE
  TD_TIME_RANGE(time,
    TD_TIME_ADD(TD_SCHEDULED_TIME(), '-1d', 'PDT'),
    TD_SCHEDULED_TIME())

Aggregating a series of LIKE clauses in one single regexp_like clause

Presto’s query optimizer is unable to improve queries that contain many LIKE clauses. As a consequence the query execution might be slower than expected.

To improve the performance,you can substitute a series of LIKE clauses that are chained with the  OR condition with a single regexp_like clause, which is Presto native.

For example:

SELECT
  ...
FROM
  access
WHERE
  method LIKE '%GET%' OR
  method LIKE '%POST%' OR
  method LIKE '%PUT%' OR
  method LIKE '%DELETE%'

can be optimized by replacing the four LIKE clauses with a single regexp_like clause:

SELECT
  ...
FROM
  access
WHERE
  regexp_like(method, 'GET|POST|PUT|DELETE')

Specifying large tables first in join clause

The default join algorithm of Presto is broadcast join, which partitions the left-hand side table of a join and sends (broadcasts) a copy of the entire right-hand side table to all of the worker nodes that have the partitions. This type of join works when your right-hand side table is small enough to fit within one node (usually less than 2GB). If you receive an ‘Exceeded max memory xxGB’ error, then the right-hand side table is too large. Presto does not perform automatic join-reordering, so make sure your large table precedes small tables in any join clause.

Turning on the distributed hash join

If you still see the memory issue, try a distributed hash join. This algorithm partitions both the left and right tables using the hash values of the join keys. So the distributed join works even if the right-hand side table is large, but the performance might be slower because the join increases the number of network data transfers. To turn on the distributed join, embed the following session property as an SQL comment:

-- set session distributed_join = 'true'
SELECT ... FROM large_table l, small_table s WHERE l.id = s.id

Note that however if there is a skew of the key values in your data, some partition needs to process larger data set compared to the others. This might slow down the query processing.

Consider Alternatives to ROW_NUMBER() Window Function

Due to a limitation in Presto's query optimizer, queries that use the ROW_NUMBER window function to find the TOP N records from a result may show poor performance or heavy memory usage in some circumstances. The issue is described in: Presto issue 5298.

If this is an issue for your query, consider one of the following alternatives:

• You may be able to substitute the RANK() or DENSE_RANK() window functions instead. For more information on the use of each function:row number rank and dense rank
• If you still require the use of ROW_NUMBER to pick out the top item in a list, you might be able to trick Presto's query optimizer into generating faster code that still uses ROW_NUMBER(). For example, if the following query is slow:

select * from (select x, y, rank() over (partition by x order by y) as rnk) 
as iq where iq.rnk = 1; 

       you can modify it as follows:

select * from (select x, y, rank() over (partition by x order by y) as rnk) 
as iq where (iq.rnk = 1 or rand() < 0);  

Test the query to validate that performance improves.